Own the lectern

I had asthma as a kid. And a lazy eye. And a glorious lack of speed, strength and dexterity. I could never climb a rope, or do the flexed-arm hang, although I did have an above-average knack for getting smacked in the face by assorted pucks, balls, rackets and other team-sport weapons.

“Nurse, come quick! Get this boy an extra-large roll of gauze and a membership card for the chess club.”

That was me.

It wasn’t merely that I was terrible at playing sports – I never even managed the art of watching them. Even the basics of sports viewership eluded me.

For instance, I’d be flummoxed when the home team would be victorious, and people would shout, “We won! We won!”

My response was always, “Really? ‘We’ won? Were you personally responsible for putting the little whatzit in the net-type area more times than the opposing team? Because my distinct impression was that there were a bunch of highly trained, highly paid professional athletes who actually won, while your contribution was to watch the game on TV, drink beer, and periodically utter the nonsensical syllable ‘Woo!’ So, you know, congratulations on that.”

(To clarify: this response was in my head only. I may not know sports, but I am a champion at minimizing the odds of physical violence being inflicted upon my person.)

There was always one exception, though. One sporting event that transcended my athletic incompatibilities, drew me in, and kept me riveted day after day: The Olympics.

On one level, Olympic competition seems every bit as compromised by doping scandals, injuries, excess and ridiculous levels of testosterone-fueled aggression that help turn me off most sports. But the weird variety of sports, the global nature of the competition, and the outlandish pomp and ceremony create a product that is both quirky and awe inspiring.

The Olympics are about much more than sports. They are about international cultural exchange, urban infrastructure megaprojects, performance psychology, sponsorship and branding, citizenship, gender issues, local politics and international peace.

And this is where the worlds of academia and athletics meet.

It’s curious. I’ve been looking into who does research related to the Olympics, and it turns out there’s a lot happening in Ontario. A Carleton prof is studying the games’ effect on low-income youth. A U of T Law prof studies the politics of how some countries provide elite athletes with citizenship just so they can compete. Meanwhile, a sports psychologist at Laurentian has a SSHRC Insight Grant to study the acculturation of elite athletes who immigrate to Canada. Western is home to the International Centre for Olympic Studies, and a kinesiology grad student at Brock is actually competing at the games.

I’ll be following up on some of these stories and others throughout the Olympics. But my one point today is that, when I talk about these researchers I find myself saying, “We do some interesting Olympics-related branding research in Ontario,” or “We’ve got some great kinesiology work happening at several universities in the province that’s making a difference to Canada’s showing at the London Olympics.” I say “we” even though I am no more responsible for these researchers’ theories and insights than I am for a sports team getting the puck-ball in the goal zone.

In the end, that feeling of “we” comes from a sense of community. Sports fans and journalists might think one player is a great and another is a bum, but in general, they’re interested in the game, excited by the pursuit of excellence, and while they’re not athletes themselves, they are part of the culture. This is exactly how I see the academic world – the passion, the competition and the aspiration are all there. “Go team!” I say.

I’m not anticipating there being university researcher trading cards or fan clubs any time soon, but I do believe that Ontarians can take some justifiable pride in the research that happens in their province.

So, as the Olympics begin, I think of all those university researchers who have helped improve athletes’ performance, who have provided such fascinating insight into ancillary Olympic issues, and who, in their own way have become world champions.

I would like to say to those researchers, “Woo!”

You deserve it.

Share: Print

Leave Comments

Blog Posts

Warring identities

Mary Chaktsiris | November 20, 2014

Can buying pigeons be a crime? In 1916, a seemingly routine act of receiving a crate of pigeons was misconstrued as an act of war. John Balasz, born in a country at war with the British Empire, was accused in Sault St. Marie of using the pigeons to carry unauthorized wartime messages. read more »

Polanyi Prize for Literature: ...

COU Staff | November 17, 2014

In modern times, alarmist visions of a grey tsunami of retirees, a lost generation of unemployed young people and a theorized war against youth have been warning global audiences that people of different age groups are simply incompatible. Andrea Charise’s research examines how the generational identity and intergenerational conflict that’s evident today was represented much earlier in literature. In fact, in 19th-century British literature and culture, older age was being reconceived, not only in literature but also as a field for health-based research. Today, we are told to do the Sudoku and exercise our body to keep ourselves young, but aging and the notion that we must keep our body and mind in perpetual motion is a late 18th-century way of thinking about the body. Charise’s research also examines the politics and poetics of generational relations in 19th--century Britain, which again surface in modern times. The conflict between the generations was evident in literary texts as far back as Oedipus Rex and King Lear, but in 1798, British economist Thomas Malthus set off a culture war when he blamed the potential catastrophe of overpopulation on the thriving reproductive capacities of young people. In modern times, Charise says the defining of age-based groups such as Boomers and Millenials is evidence of generational identity and intergenerational conflict in the modern literary imagination. Literature and the humanities, her research concludes, are crucial to communicating in accessible ways the consequences of the way we think about age and the way generations think about each other. Andrea Charise, Assistant Professor of Health Studies, University of Toronto, Scarborough wins the Polanyi Prize for Literature.

Polanyi Prize for Physics: ...

COU Staff |

Eduardo Martin-Martinez’s research explores a new field that combines the two most fundamental pillars of physics – quantum theory and general relativity - to understand the nature of the gravitational interaction and to build new technology that breaks the boundaries of what we thought was possible. Einstein gave us a new theory of gravity in the early 1900s, and for years physicists have tried unsuccessfully to examine gravity in relation to quantum theory. Martin-Martinez wants to use quantum information theory to learn more about gravity. General relativity – which has been used in modern technology such as GPS – tells us that the force of gravity is caused by curvature of spacetime. Two masses attract in the way two billiard balls attract each other when placed on a trampoline. Mass and energy move in a curved spacetime and the spacetime is curved by the presence of mass and energy. One of the most important modern challenges is to find a quantum description of gravity. Quantum information theory studies the storage, transmission and processing of information through quantum systems. In this context, quantum mechanics allows us to carry out tasks that were previously considered impossible. Quantum physics can deliver computers exponentially faster than the computers we can conceive of today, solve complex problems, store large amounts of information, and allow absolutely secure communications using quantum cryptography. The goal of Martin-Martinez’s research is to use powerful tools from quantum information, science and technology to study quantum effects induced by gravity and, through them, to learn new information about spacetime. At the same time, he wants to use the theory of relativity to develop new quantum technologies. Potential applications include quantum computing technology and answers to how curvature and quantum theory affect the processing of information. Eduardo Martin-Martinez, Research Assistant Professor, Institute for Quantum Computing, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo wins the Polanyi Prize for Physics.

Polanyi Prize for Economic ...

COU Staff |

Rahul Deb’s research examines whether it is possible to tell using a relatively simple test whether firms involved in a competitive bid for business with government or another regulated vendor are genuinely competing, or whether they are secretly colluding. read more »
More Blogs »