What does a human right to water mean?

Is there a world water crisis happening right now, and if so, how is it affected by a recent push to establish water as a human right? This was one of the ideas explored during a recent talk by Wilfrid Laurier University Professor Alex Latta at THEMUSEUM in downtown Kitchener.

Latta’s research focuses on water issues in Chile related to hydroelectric development, as well as “ecological citizenship” — the way that environmental issues relate to the political sphere.

The talk focused on different forms of water scarcity and how they speak to the idea of access to water as a fundamental right. According to Latta, water scarcity takes four main forms: “challenges for provision of water/sanitation, changing distributions of water (mainly due to climate change), contamination and pollution of water, and the increased competition for water resources resulting from the global increase in population and standards of living.”

In light of the 2010 United Nations General Assembly Resolution 64/292 on the Human Right to Water and Sanitation, Latta sought to probe the meaning of a human right to water in the face of these different forms of scarcity.

Throughout the talk, Latta presented two views regarding this question: a minimalist interpretation of the human right to water, focussed on access for basic needs, and an alternate vision regarding water democracy and water justice, which has arisen out of movements against water privatization around the world.

The first perspective takes the view of several key international organizations, including the World Water Council, the World Water Forum and the World Bank. According to Latta, in this perspective the right to water means: “an end to water poverty, access to improved water and sanitation, and hopefully access to ‘safe’ water sources”.

The second perspective proposes that access to water is a social justice issue, and that water should be a public good. Focussed especially on the Global South, this view brings examples of water injustice to the forefront, including water inequality in Africa, the impacts on different socioeconomic groups due to increasing competition for water resources, and the role of large-scale industry and agriculture in widespread water contamination. From this perspective, Latta claims that a right to water means: “social justice in water and sanitation, protection of community water sources, climate justice in relation to water scarcity, and water as a public good, not a commodity.”

Though giving exposure to both sides of this debate, Latta left no doubt that he favours the latter perspective, suggesting that “only a more expansive debate around the right to water can adequately address the challenge of insuring more egalitarian access to this vital resource”.

Latta stressed the importance of taking a global perspective in these areas.

“As Canadians, we’re implicated in issues in other parts of the world,” he said. “In particular, we cannot dismiss the fact that our carbon footprint is significant. We must take some responsibility for the effects of climate change and the implications this is having for changing distributions of water around the globe.”

Latta also highlighted the value of this discussion, which was part of Laurier’s Water Dialogues series, happening out in the community, rather than on campus.

“Having a public space to explore these issues is very important,” said Latta. “It helps to get people thinking and talking about this important topic.”

Tagged: Culture, Economy, Nature, Events, Stories

Share: Print

Leave Comments

Blog Posts

Warring identities

Mary Chaktsiris | November 20, 2014

Can buying pigeons be a crime? In 1916, a seemingly routine act of receiving a crate of pigeons was misconstrued as an act of war. John Balasz, born in a country at war with the British Empire, was accused in Sault St. Marie of using the pigeons to carry unauthorized wartime messages. read more »

Polanyi Prize for Literature: ...

COU Staff | November 17, 2014

In modern times, alarmist visions of a grey tsunami of retirees, a lost generation of unemployed young people and a theorized war against youth have been warning global audiences that people of different age groups are simply incompatible. Andrea Charise’s research examines how the generational identity and intergenerational conflict that’s evident today was represented much earlier in literature. In fact, in 19th-century British literature and culture, older age was being reconceived, not only in literature but also as a field for health-based research. Today, we are told to do the Sudoku and exercise our body to keep ourselves young, but aging and the notion that we must keep our body and mind in perpetual motion is a late 18th-century way of thinking about the body. Charise’s research also examines the politics and poetics of generational relations in 19th--century Britain, which again surface in modern times. The conflict between the generations was evident in literary texts as far back as Oedipus Rex and King Lear, but in 1798, British economist Thomas Malthus set off a culture war when he blamed the potential catastrophe of overpopulation on the thriving reproductive capacities of young people. In modern times, Charise says the defining of age-based groups such as Boomers and Millenials is evidence of generational identity and intergenerational conflict in the modern literary imagination. Literature and the humanities, her research concludes, are crucial to communicating in accessible ways the consequences of the way we think about age and the way generations think about each other. Andrea Charise, Assistant Professor of Health Studies, University of Toronto, Scarborough wins the Polanyi Prize for Literature.

Polanyi Prize for Physics: ...

COU Staff |

Eduardo Martin-Martinez’s research explores a new field that combines the two most fundamental pillars of physics – quantum theory and general relativity - to understand the nature of the gravitational interaction and to build new technology that breaks the boundaries of what we thought was possible. Einstein gave us a new theory of gravity in the early 1900s, and for years physicists have tried unsuccessfully to examine gravity in relation to quantum theory. Martin-Martinez wants to use quantum information theory to learn more about gravity. General relativity – which has been used in modern technology such as GPS – tells us that the force of gravity is caused by curvature of spacetime. Two masses attract in the way two billiard balls attract each other when placed on a trampoline. Mass and energy move in a curved spacetime and the spacetime is curved by the presence of mass and energy. One of the most important modern challenges is to find a quantum description of gravity. Quantum information theory studies the storage, transmission and processing of information through quantum systems. In this context, quantum mechanics allows us to carry out tasks that were previously considered impossible. Quantum physics can deliver computers exponentially faster than the computers we can conceive of today, solve complex problems, store large amounts of information, and allow absolutely secure communications using quantum cryptography. The goal of Martin-Martinez’s research is to use powerful tools from quantum information, science and technology to study quantum effects induced by gravity and, through them, to learn new information about spacetime. At the same time, he wants to use the theory of relativity to develop new quantum technologies. Potential applications include quantum computing technology and answers to how curvature and quantum theory affect the processing of information. Eduardo Martin-Martinez, Research Assistant Professor, Institute for Quantum Computing, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo wins the Polanyi Prize for Physics.

Polanyi Prize for Economic ...

COU Staff |

Rahul Deb’s research examines whether it is possible to tell using a relatively simple test whether firms involved in a competitive bid for business with government or another regulated vendor are genuinely competing, or whether they are secretly colluding. read more »
More Blogs »