Climate change models omit key component

Climate models used to study temperature change from greenhouse gases are missing a key ingredient — economics, according to a new study by a University of Guelph professor.

Economist Ross McKitrick, an expert in environmental policy analysis, says most models ignore the effects of socioeconomic change on land use changes, making those models inaccurate.

The study, co-authored with Lise Tole of Strathclyde University, was published online in the journal Climate Dynamics.

McKitrick has studied how land use changes from urbanization, agriculture and other surface modifications affect temperature trends around the world. Past research suggests these effects might account for some of the warming patterns in weather data. Climate modelers assume that the effects are filtered out at the data processing stage, he said.

“As a result, when researchers look for explanations of regional patterns of climatic changes, they rule out things like urbanization by assumption and give greater weight to global factors like greenhouse gases and solar variations,” McKitrick said.

The study examined data from 22 sophisticated climate models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The researchers compared how accurately those models would have predicted spatial warming patterns over land between 1979 and 2002 with predictions from a much simpler model using data on regional industrialization and socioeconomic growth.

“The contrasts were striking,” McKitrick said. Twenty of the IPCC models made predictions that were no better than random guesses or that contradicted the observed patterns, he said.

“Only two of the 22 models showed any explanatory power for the temperature changes over the same period.”

By contrast, the simple economic model made much more accurate predictions.

Using various statistical techniques to compare modeling approaches, the researchers found that usually the economic model was essential and the climate model could be dropped, but never the other way around.

One technique involved searching more than 537 million combinations of climate model outputs and socioeconomic data for the best possible mix. The research team found that combining three of the 22 climate models and a small number of socioeconomic indicators best explained the spatial pattern of surface temperature trends.

“By assuming the socioeconomic effects are not there, a lot of climate researchers are ignoring a key feature of the data,” McKitrick said.

The researchers also found that the best climate models aren’t necessarily the most well-known ones. The best models came from labs in China and Russia and from one American institute; models from Canada, Japan, Europe and most U.S. research labs lacked explanatory power, either alone or in combination.

The study has important implications for policy-makers, McKitrick said. “Computer forecasts of regional climate changes between now and 2030 can look impressive in their detail, but it would be wise not to make major policy decisions without first looking into the model’s forecast accuracy.”

The findings are also important for researchers, especially those using climate data sets. “A lot of the current thinking about the causes of climate change relies on the assumption that the effects of land surface modification due to economic growth patterns have been filtered out of temperature data sets. But this assumption is not true.”

 

Originally published on June 20, 2012 by the University of Guelph. Ross McKitrick speaks at the What Matters Now event in Thunder Bay on March 4.

Tagged: Economy, Nature, Blog, Events, Stories

Share: Print

Leave Comments

Blog Posts

Northern flying squirrel.

When habitats collide

Sharon Oosthoek | August 4, 2015

1995 was a very good year to be a southern flying squirrel in Ontario. It marked the start of a series of unusually warm winters that saw the rodents creep north 240 kilometres into the range of their larger cousin, the northern flying squirrel. The incursion wasn’t widely noticed by humans. The two species are closely-related and look much alike with their large dark eyes and furry membrane between their front and rear legs that they use to glide. But some humans were watching — including wildlife geneticist Paul Wilson and population ecologist Jeff Bowman, both from Trent University ­— and they wondered if the two species were crossbreeding and having hybrid babies. When the researchers trapped flying squirrels and analyzed the DNA in their fur, they discovered that was exactly what was happening. The pair now believes this is the first example of hybridization following the expansion of a species’ range due to modern climate change. Testing by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry suggests roughly four per cent of Ontario's flying squirrels are now genetic hybrids. Hybrid wildlife is not new. However, human-induced changes such as the deliberate introductions of animals, habitat fragmentation and climate change may be bringing species together more frequently and in greater numbers than ever before. The list of cross-breeding Canadian wildlife is already long:  the golden-winged warbler in Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec; the eastern wolf in Ontario and Quebec; and a handful of polar bear/grizzly crosses known as grizzlars in the Northwest Territories. Scientists also point to bob cat/lynx hybrids in New Brunswick, known as bob-o-linx, rainbow and cutthroat trout in Alberta, and spotted/barred owls in British Columbia. Now what? As humans wittingly and unwittingly move species around, is the resulting cross-breeding a good or bad thing? How will hybrids affect other animals and plants in the ecosystem? And what of endangered animals —  could hybrids genetically weaken their parent populations? These are all tricky, and as of yet, answered questions.  As Wilson and Bowman point out, some biologists worry that accepting hybrids could give people an excuse not to protect the habitat of endangered species.  These scientists also argue wildlife hybridization threatens unique lineages, with interbreeding potentially leading to the extinction of rare species. Others suspect hybrids may be Mother Nature's answer to the rapid changes humans have wrought. They say hybrids allow for a greater mix of genes within a single population of animals and act as an insurance policy of sorts. In other words, the greater an animal's genetic diversity, the more chance there is for it to adapt to a rapidly changing environment. This genetic adaptability is why Wilson now studies the hybrid squirrel genome for adaptive advantages, such as the northerner's ability to withstand cold and the southerner's ability to fight off diseases from warmer climates. “One could look at these hybrids as a creative reshuffling of the genetic material for a changing landscape,” says Wilson. “I mean climate change isn’t going to go away … maybe these hybrids are emerging as the most adapted animal for the changing landscape and climate.”
Timothy Muttoo (University of Waterloo) with clay filter

Low tech water filter

Christine Bezruki | July 27, 2015

It may use the most simple of technology, but a new water filtration system is transforming thousands of lives in the Dominican Republic. Designed by University of Waterloo Masters of Public Health student, Timothy Muttoo, in partnership with the non-profit organization FilterPure, the new filters use locally-sourced clay, sawdust and particles of silver to remove 99.99 per cent of all water contaminants. read more »

Breaking for water

Sharon Oosthoek | July 22, 2015

A strenuous workout should be accompanied by frequent water breaks, right? Not so fast, says Brock University physiologist Stephen Cheung. While that certainly is the received wisdom, Cheung points out that top-performing athletes almost always speed past water stops in an effort to shave seconds off their time. read more »
River rapids

Tribal waters

Noreen Fagan | July 20, 2015

Dan Walters is interested in water — especially in its emotional, spiritual and social connections to First Nation communities. A professor of geography at Nipissing University, Walter's current project assesses risk levels in drinking water and wastewater in the Dokis First Nation, located on the French River near Georgian Bay. read more »
Bay of Fundy

Changing tides

Sharon Oosthoek | July 13, 2015

Tidal speeds in Nova Scotia's Bay of Fundy can reach a staggering five metres per second.  By comparison a very fast river flows at about two to three metres per second, "and you wouldn't want to fall into a current like that," says Queen's University professor in coastal engineering Ryan Mulligan. read more »
More Blogs »